By Pete Jones and Richard Lough
Congo’s accusations against Uganda shows the deep mistrust in the region, a barrier standing in the way of long-term peace despite the defeat of the M23’s 20-month insurgency by Congo’s United Nations-backed army. Congolese and rebel negotiators failed to agree on the wording of the document meant to cap the army’s swift military gains that led to M23 last week abandoning its uprising in Congo’s mineral-rich border zone with Rwanda and Uganda.
“What are we supposed to sign? No country in history has signed an agreement with a movement that has declared its own dissolution,” said Lambert Mende, a spokesman for Democratic Republic of Congo’s government. Mende said Kinshasa wants the rebels to pledge not to take up arms again but Uganda was blocking this.
“Uganda seems now to be acting as part of the conflict. It has interests in M23.” Uganda and Rwanda have both been accused by U.N. experts of backing M23, the latest in a series of uprisings led by Congolese Tutsi fighters in the east, which is rich in gold, diamonds and other minerals. Both countries deny the charges.
Bertrand Bisimwa, political head of the M23, was not immediately available for comment. Sultani Makenga, its military chief, is being held by Uganda after he abandoned the rebels’ last hill-top positions with hundreds of fighters.
Despite the demise of M23, a plethora of other rebel groups operate in eastern Congo, which is also riddled with conflicts over land, ethnicity and access to resources. Envoys from the United Nations, European Union, African Union and United States had gathered in Uganda to witness the signing. After it fell through, they insisted on further talks to secure a political deal to accompany M23’s military defeat.
“The Envoys urge the parties to resolve the differences relating to the format of the document and to remain committed to a peaceful settlement of the conflict,” they said. Uganda’s lead mediator, Defence Minister Chrispus Kiyonga, said both sides had concluded negotiations over the 11-point document on November 3, two days before the rebels announced they were laying down their arms.
A second source close to the peace talks said the Kinshasa and M23 delegations had both initialled each page. The accord will address issues such as amnesty – for the act of rebellion, though not for crimes against humanity. That will almost certainly mean no amnesty for Makenga.
It is also expected to tackle some of the root causes of the unrest, including the return of stolen property and issues surrounding the return of Tutsi refugees to Congo. Congo’s President Joseph Kabila is keen to capitalise politically on his army’s victory, the first over a major rebellion in the distant, lawless east. A Ugandan source close to the mediation said this was made clear during talks.
“The Kinshasa people don’t even want to sit in the same room with M23 team. They want to sit in separate rooms because (they feel) they are not equals.” However, Christoph Wille, an Africa analyst at Control Risks, said Kabila was unlikely to completely back out of talks as a deal would boost his mandate at a time when he is looking towards 2016, when his second and final term is due to end.
Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/congo-m23-rebels-peace-signing-delayed-over-wording-064243011.html?soc_src=mediacontentsharebuttons
