It has always been my submission that the so-called Tutsi genocide narrative is actually a hoax that was meant to cover up the insane massacres Paul Kagame and some of his then Tutsi dominated rebel group perpetrated.
The narrative was also meant to offer both military and moral victory to Kagame and his rebels while making sure that the Hutu are defeated militarily, morally and psychologically. This was a strategic foundation for Kagame’s dictatorship.
After watching ” Rwanda’s Untold Story”: BBC documentary, who, in their right mind would believe the Tutsi genocide narrative as Kagame and his western lobbyists want to push it down our throat? Shouldn’t Kagame’s role in the Rwandan massacres be investigated? Where does Kagame get the moral authority to demonize his then military opponents the Hutu?
It is my founded submission that both sides to the conflict engaged in the horrible massacres and both sides butchered Hutu and Tutsi innocent civilians for different reasons and motive and so, the massacres committed by either side are wrongly characterized as genocide, at least as a matter of law.